![]() However, if the problem is that some application might be sniffing your variables in the. I will admit, I have no clue how these exploits are executed. Net memory, could the same snooping malicious codes simply look for a PasswordBox that is hanging around in memory and find some way to access the Password field, making the use of the SecureString value essentially useless? However, since the point of the secured form of the string is to keep the value secure from a snooping process (I assume) that can read the. I would like to assume that if I never access the Password property within my application, an insecure version of my sensitive information will never be generated and have to be garbage collected. However, there is one major flaw that I see with this control- it has a Password property which is the user-entered content in an insecure. For the sake of security, it provides a SecureString object through the SecurePassword property which is, in my case, secure enough for my needs. Out of the box, the WPF PasswordBox is the go to control for getting passwords, or other sensitive information. For a look at the companies that currently offer and enterprise IAM solutions you can link over to our Solutions Directory and Buyers Guide.Īs mentioned in a previous post, Identity Management is an incredibly hot space right now, so you should expect to see lots more Identity Management acquisitions like this in 2015.I've already asked a couple of questions around the PasswordBox recently, but at the heart of my issue, I need an extremely secure way of getting very sensitive information inputted into my. It remains to be seen, however, if Intel intends to take that tech and turn it into an enterprise IAM solution or whether they will keep it a nice free personal identity manager. Intel said that the tech will be added to the company’s “Safe Identity organization within Intel’s Security Group,” according to CIO, although for now the IAM solution is being offered just the same as it always has, with all customers given premium service at no cost until the 2 year old Montreal-based start up is fully incorporated into the technology giant.Īlthough the details of the deal were not disclosed, I bet the founders of the 44 employee did quite well, given all the nifty tech they’re handing over. Ingenious, but for some reason attaching your log in credentials to one of the organs most responsible for keeping you alive feels a bit off putting, even if it turns out to be effective. “The startup also ventured into biometric security when it partnered with Bionym, the makers of a wristband that uses the unique signature of someone’s heartbeat to validate logins, replacing the PasswordBox master password and providing 3-factor authentication.” A feature called Legacy Locker can be used to transfer account logins after someone dies.”Īnd if you thought that last part was a little creepy, check out this next part: “PasswordBox also offers a secure way to share account passwords with family, friends or co-workers, and also lets users create encrypted notes and keep track of credit cards, passports, memberships and other sensitive personal data in a digital wallet. That’s not the only feature PasswordBox offers according to CIO: When surfing the Web, users can click on the sites they want to login to and PasswordBox handles the login.” “PasswordBox lets users store login credentials in what the company calls a virtual safety deposit box. The technology PasswordBox has allows users to log onto many different websites and services with just one click of the mouse. Intel is making a move on the Identity and Access Management market by purchasing Canadian IAM provider PasswordBox, according to a report from CIO Magazine’s website.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |